I created this blog for my class EDU 271. I had posted content related to my online courses at Haywood Community College, my job at Nazarene Child Care, and my greatest possession ~ my family. I also included some of my personal likes and dislikes. Thank you for visiting my blog!
Now, I will be utilizing this blog page for my new course (EDUC 633) at Liberty University. As always, thank you for visiting!
***Note: clicking on EDUC tabs takes you away from this site.

Research







 

 



Marie Blankenship
EDUC 500-B19
Liberty University










Introduction
Two questions that are commonly asked regarding education.  What makes an effective educator?  And, what is the best way to engage learners?  These two questions go hand in hand as an effective educator would be engaging learners.  Wallace (2015) states that these questions remain difficult to answer and one should consider a range of theories to determine the most appropriate for the situation.  Several factors are involved in determining the best practices that create positive learning experiences for all diverse learners.  This paper will examine those factors and how it affects the learner beginning with learning theories.
Learning Theory and Its Importance
It remains important for educators to explore research-based learning theories.  Wallace (2015) defined learning theory as “the body of theory about how and why learning takes place draws heavily on the work of schools of psychology as diverse as the behaviorists, on the one hand, and the humanists, on the other” (n.p.).  Some educators focus in on one theory and follow that theorist.  The differing nature of theories may be one reason educators chose one theorist to follow.  Theories differ in numerous ways such as predicting how learning occurs, determining important learning processes, determining which learning aspect to stress, oriented toward basic or applied learning, and stressing the roles of development, instruction, or motivation (Slavin & Schunk, 2017).  Slavin and Schunk (2017) explain that overlap between theories can be confusing which is normal.  Continuing, they state that even though theorists differ many are based “on a common foundation of cognition [which contends] that learning involves changes in learners’ thoughts, beliefs, knowledge, strategies, and skills” (p. 2).  They suggested that an educator should first examine their own beliefs and assumptions regarding learning only then can one decide which learning theory or theories fits.  Van Brummelen (2009) reveals the complexity of the interactions between theory and practice stating that educators need to define and redefine what they believe about learning.  This implies that as educators become more experienced their views on learning and teaching may change which will in turn affect which theories they employ in the classroom.  Wang (2015) explained the basics of two common learning theories: behaviorist and constructivist.  Stating that the mind, as viewed by behaviorist theory, places knowledge in a file cabinet or container to be retrieved later.  Whereas, constructivist theory emphasizes a child-centered approach where knowledge is constructive in a peer social environment that prepares for lifelong learning (Wang, 2015).  Tomasello (2016) took this one step further, explaining that beyond constructivist social learning theory stands cultural learning theory.  He argues that cultural learning “enables individuals to learn through one another in powerful enough ways to support the cumulative cultural evolution of human artifacts and practices over historical time” (Tomasello, 2016, p. 643).  As stated earlier, there exist a multitude of theories for educator to follow.  Slavin and Schunk (2017) stated that the bridge between research and educational practices is through theories which provide tools for organization and recommendations for educational practice.  It is important to remember that learning theory and educational practices complement each other while helping to refine one another (Slavin & Schunk, 2017).  Wallace (2015) warns that theory is only useful when it works, and education professionals should create their own beliefs about learning based on personal experiences and accumulated knowledge.  This knowledge can from research or professional development.   
Description of an Effective Teacher
One theoretical approach over another is not what makes an effective teacher.  Rather, it is the successful implementation of the correct theoretical approach for the situation.  Below are included some viewpoints on effective teachers.  Gweon, Shafto, and Schulz (2018) purposed that effective educators communicate information that is sufficient, relevant, and beneficial to others which avoid cognitive overload.  Slavin and Schunk (2017) stated, “effective teaching requires that we determine the best theoretical perspectives for the types of learning we deal with and their implications for teaching” (p. 25).  There are strategies that educators can utilize to be more effective which include but are not limited to: providing interesting lessons, engaging learner imagination and energy, effective use of time, communicates purpose, high expectations, contagious enthusiasm, effective feedback, clear expectations and clear explanations (Slavin & Schunk, 2017).  Also, the intentional educator will utilize motivation to improve teaching and learning.  “Teachers need to engage children mentally in learning by making teaching intention explicit, and emphasizing the knowledge change” (Wang, 2015).  Van Brummelen (2009) poetically described effective educators as craftsperson’s that are reflective, diligent, and skillful while continuingly honing their craft.  Continuing, he explains that effective educators systemically analyze and reflect on their efforts and its effects.  This educator will learn through practice and utilized the experience gained to improve upon skills.  additionally, they will be self-critical and revise teaching accordingly which can be referred to as a reflective practitioner (Van Brummelen, 2009).  Van Brummelen (2009) maintains “teaching has a strong moral and religious component” that leads in the path one should go which would make teaching a religious craft (p. 39).
An effective educator will create an effective learning environment as the two go hand in hand.  The strategies utilized to create this type of environment include: preventing and responding to misconduct, time management, providing an atmosphere that supports interest and inquiry, activities that engage minds and imaginations, direct instruction, technology, motivation, classroom management, and meaningful experiences (Slavin & Schunk, 2017).  Lucas, Burdett, Burgess, Wood, McGuigan, Harris and Whiten (2017) concluded through their research that learners learn best from individuals they feel familiar, which indicated that educators need to create a nurturing environment for effective learning to occur.  Looking at another aspect such as direct instruction which is defined as information being transmitted directly to a group of learners (Slavin & Schunk, 2017).  Wang (2015) purposed that direct instruction and collaboration learning boost motivation delivering effective results in learning.  While, Cavadel and Frye (2017) suggested that direct instruction may not be well suited for younger learners as teaching is complex and involves mind, emotion, and motivation.  Technology is another aspect to enhance learning.  Slavin and Schunk (2017) explained that integrating visual and auditory content engages learners beyond the classroom and can include interactive whiteboards, DVDs, graphics, videos, and other devises.  Cavadel and Frye (2017) suggested utilizing simulated gaming technology to guide discovery learning which creates interest and motivation within the learner to complete the activity.  Other researchers stated that an effective method for creating interest utilizes multimedia component and technology learning systems that provide an interactive learning environment (Banire, Jomhari, and Ahmad, 2015).  Slavin and Schunk (2017) revealed that motivation remains highly important describing it as the willingness to put forth effort to learn.  Unfortunately, motivation is difficult to measure and varies.  “Psychologist define motivation as an internal process that activates, guides, and maintains behavior over time” (Slavin & Schunk, 2017, p. 272).  Haimovitz and Dweck (2017) conducted research that concluded that motivation and learning are correlated to the learner’s mind set.  To increase motivation, Tomasello (2016) purposed collaboration as learners are more motivated to solve problems collaboratively than alone and work longer and harder.  The last aspect examined here regards classroom management.  This aspect affects multiple areas such as: dealing with misbehavior, using time effectively, creating learning conducive atmospheres, and engaging leaners minds and imaginations (Slavin & Schunk, 2017).  Continuing, they state that effective instruction remains the most effective strategy.  Van Brummelen (2009) suggested making schools communities of learning where all take delight in working together to build common commitment, values, and purpose.  This would create relationships based on the Great Commandment as described in Ephesians (Van Brummelen, 2009).

Actively Including and Engaging Learners with Diverse Needs and Exceptionalities
Today, most school systems provide inclusive classrooms.  However, the amount of time spent in an inclusive classroom may vary, depending on the school system and the diverse need.  Slavin and Schunk (2017) reveal that inclusion is not just instructional, it is social as well and the educator’s role is critical.  Continuing, they explain that educators’ attitudes are important for positive interactions and modeling for learners without disabilities.  Two strategies for successful social integration could be utilizing cooperative learning methods and social skill training which improves social acceptance (Slavin & Schunk, 2017).  One might ask what is meant by learners with exceptionalities?  Slavin and Schunk (2017) explain this involves learners with special needs regarding societal and school norms and having the inability for any reason to perform academic tasks.  Continuing, they defined handicap as “a condition or barrier imposed by the environment or self” and disability as “a functional limitation that interferes with a person’s mental, physical, or sensory abilities” (p. 266).  Van Brummelen (2009) contributes to this discussion stating that sensitivity must be on the educator’s mind as classroom are so diverse and unique today.  Continuing, he reminds that each child is special as a creation of God deserving acceptance and an opportunity to learn.  Diversities and exceptionalities come in numerous forms and Jesus set an example for educator by loving and caring for all no matter how different.  Van Brummelen (2009) also reminded of Paul’s teachings which stated that all parts of the body were important even if they seem weak.
Behavior and character are two sides of the same coin.  Behavior can be most effectively be controlled through prevention as learners tend to behave during engaging and interesting activities (Slavin & Schunk, 2017).  When learners get bored or fatigued, cooperative leaning methods that actively involve the learner should prove helpful.  For more stubborn misbehavior, look to behavioral learning theories as there may be some reinforcer being maintained with the most common being attention related (Slavin & Schunk, 2017).  Van Brummelen (2009) discussed character development and described it as the “teaching of ethical principles and conduct” or character education (p. 232).  Continuing, he explained that this refers to the virtues in Titus and the fruits of the spirit in Galatians.  Character education teaches social justice and equality while promoting “positive personal growth and learning” (Van Brummelen, 2009, p. 233).

Engaging Students in Learning, Building Self-Efficacy and Motivation
Motivated learners can self-regulate and engage in learning.  Slavin and Schunk (2017) stated motivational influences that are important to “learning are goals, outcomes expectations, values, and self-efficacy” (p. 133).  Self-efficacy is different then self-esteem; whereas, self-efficacy refers to “one’s perceived capabilities of learning or performing” (Slavin & Schunk, 2017, p. 133).  Ones self-efficacy can affect choices made and learners achievement.  Educators can help build learners self-efficacy through effective positive feedback, creating opportunities for success, vicarious modeling, and from physiological symptoms experienced (Slavin & Schunk, 2017).  Van Brummelen (2009) contributed to this discussion suggesting that educators facilitate learner’s successful achievement which is the best motivator.  Continued success enhances self-efficacy. 
Personal Reflections/Conclusion
Educator must first determine what they personally believe about teaching and learning.  Only then can the educator select a learning theory or theories that best fits and can be utilized in their classroom.  This educator considers herself as an eclectic educator which was mentioned in Slavin and Schunk (2017).  Over the many years of teaching my personal learning theory has changed starting with Piaget moving to behaviorist with a period focusing on Vygotsky.  Now, this educator picks and chooses which theory is appropriate for the circumstances with Bandura having the greatest influence.  Choosing the theory that best fits the situation facilitates the successful implementation of the theory in the classroom which is one point of an effective educator.  This educator is constantly trying to learn new approaches and new from past mistakes.  Does that make this educator perfect?  Definitely not!  The Bible declares; “As it is written: None is righteous, no, not one” (Romans 3:10, English Standard Version).  Striving to be an effective educator an effort is made to create a learning environment that is nurturing and welcoming.  This includes preventing and responding to misconduct, time management, providing an atmosphere that supports interest and inquiry, activities that engage minds and imaginations, direct instruction, technology, motivation, classroom management, and meaningful experiences.  This is reflected in Proverbs 22:6 (ESV); “Train up a child in the way he should go; even when he is old he will not depart from it.”  The effective classroom also accepts all learners no matter the diversity or exceptionality.  The educator should be sensitive and a model that encourages respectful social interaction.  God declared in His word; “Love one another with brotherly affection. Outdo one another in showing honor” (Romans 12:10, ESV).  Next, the effective classroom should address behavior and character development.  This educator has utilized redirection and positive engagement for quite some time.  Both behavior and character can be address by following Galatians 5:22 (ESV); “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness.”  The effective educator also motivates and enhances learner’s self-efficacy.  This educator meets this by providing effective positive feedback, appropriate praise, and modeling.  The Bible declares; “show yourself in all respects to be a model of good works, and in your teaching show integrity, dignity” (Titus 2:7, ESV).  Teaching in both Christian and public-school settings, this educator has tried to utilize the gifts given by God to lead children in the way they should go while creating a safe learning environment… “As each has received a gift, use it to serve one another, as good stewards of God's varied grace” (1 Peter 4:10, ESV).


References
Banire, B., Jomhari, N., & Ahmad, R. (2015). Visual hybrid development learning system (VHDLS) framework for children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(10), 3069-3084. doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2469-7
Cavadel, E. W., & Frye, D. A. (2017). Not just numeracy and literacy: Theory of mind development and school readiness among low-income children. Developmental Psychology, 53(12), 2290-2303. doi:10.1037/dev0000409
Gweon, H., Shafto, P., & Schulz, L. (2018). Development of children's sensitivity to overinformativeness in learning and teaching. Developmental Psychology, 54(11), 2113.
Haimovitz, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2017). The origins of children's growth and fixed mindsets: New research and a new proposal. Child Development, 88(6), 1849-1859. doi:10.1111/cdev.12955
Lucas, A. J., Burdett, E. R. R., Burgess, V., Wood, L. A., McGuigan, N., Harris, P. L., & Whiten, A. (2017). The development of selective copying: Children's learning from an expert versus their mother. Child Development, 88(6), 2026-2042. doi:10.1111/cdev.12711
Slavin, R. E., & Schunk, D.H. (2017). Learning theories: EDUC 500 (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Tomasello, M. (2016). Cultural learning redux. Child Development, 87(3), 643-653. doi:10.1111/cdev.12499
Van Brummelen, H. (2009). Walking with God in the classroom: Christian approaches to learning and teaching (3rd ed.). Colorado Springs, CO: Purposeful Design.
Wallace, S. (2015). A dictionary of education (Second ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wang, Z. (2015). Theory of mind and children s understanding of teaching and learning during early childhood. Cogent Education, 2(1) doi:10.1080/2331186X.2015.1011973

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting.